User talk:Palauenc05
Quality Image Promotion
[edit] |
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Welschbillig Stadtwappen Burgstrasse 14.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
--QICbot (talk) 05:23, 4 February 2024 (UTC)
Quality Image Promotion
[edit] |
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Butzweiler Friedhofskreuz 1785.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
--QICbot (talk) 05:23, 5 February 2024 (UTC)
Quality Image Promotion
[edit] |
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Treuenbrietzen 50 Pfg 1921 Luther.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
--QICbot (talk) 05:28, 29 February 2024 (UTC)
FP Promotion
[edit] |
★ This image has been promoted to Featured picture! ★
The image File:Treuenbrietzen 50 Pfg 1921 Luther.jpg, that you nominated on Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Treuenbrietzen 50 Pfg 1921 Luther.jpg has been promoted. Thank you for your contribution. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so. |
|
/FPCBot (talk) 05:02, 3 March 2024 (UTC)
Quality Image Promotion
[edit] |
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Treuenbrietzen 50 Pfg 1921 Mutter Gottes.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
 |
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Treuenbrietzen 50 Pfg 1921 Waldemar.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
--QICbot (talk) 05:26, 3 March 2024 (UTC)
Valued Image Promoted
[edit]Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
50 Pfennig Notgeld Banknote (1921) of Treuenbrietzen, Germany, RV: Martin Luther..
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.
--VICBot2 (talk) 00:22, 4 March 2024 (UTC)
Quality Image Promotion
[edit].jpg){kind=spacer} |
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Ehrang Blankenheimer Kreuz (1).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
--QICbot (talk) 05:28, 5 March 2024 (UTC)
Quality Image Promotion
[edit] |
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Treuenbrietzen 50 Pfg 1921 Stadtansicht.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
 |
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Treuenbrietzen 50 Pfg 1921 Kurfürst Ludwig I.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
 |
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Trier-Biewer St-Jakobus-Brunnen.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
--QICbot (talk) 05:29, 6 March 2024 (UTC)
Valued Image Promoted
[edit]Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
50 Pfennig Notgeld banknote of Treuenbrietzen, 1921 by Heinz Schiestl, reverse: "Mutter Gottes"..
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
50 Pfennig Notgeld banknote of Treuenbrietzen, 1921 by Heinz Schiestl, reverse: "False Waldemar is not let into the town"..
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
St.-Jakobus-Fountain in Trier, Germany..
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.
--VICBot2 (talk) 00:22, 7 March 2024 (UTC)
Quality Image Promotion
[edit] |
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Treuenbrietzen 50 Pfg 1921 Söhne der Stadt.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
 |
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Trier Landkreis 1 Million 1923.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
--QICbot (talk) 05:26, 9 March 2024 (UTC)
Valued Image Promoted
[edit]Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
50 Pfennig Notgeld banknote (1921) by Heinz Schiestl of Treuenbrietzen, Germany, reverse: three sons of the town..
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Fountain (1829-1898) at Viehmarktplatz in Trier, Germany..
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
50 Pfennig Notgeld banknote (1921) by Heinz Schiestl of Treuenbrietzen, Germany, reverse: view of the town..
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.
--VICBot2 (talk) 00:23, 13 March 2024 (UTC)
Datum
[edit]Hallo! Ist das Bild vom Treppenaufgang Pfeiffersbrücke auch von 2022 wie das von der Petrusskulptur, oder vom 16.3.24? Kann man normalerweise davon ausgehen, dass das Aufnahmedatum dem angegebenen Datum entspricht? (Da ich der Vollständigkeit halber gerne das taken-on-Template einsetze) VG P170 (talk) 17:30, 17 March 2024 (UTC)
- Stimmt. --Palauenc05 (talk) 17:31, 17 March 2024 (UTC)
- @Palauenc05: Vielleicht möchtest Du bei Gelegenheit nochmal genauer auf die Frage(n) antworten :-) --P170 (talk) 18:18, 17 March 2024 (UTC)
- Die in den Bildbeschreibungen angegebenen Daten sind die Aufnahmedaten. --Palauenc05 (talk) 18:22, 17 March 2024 (UTC)
- Alles klar, Danke --P170 (talk) 19:07, 17 March 2024 (UTC)
- Die in den Bildbeschreibungen angegebenen Daten sind die Aufnahmedaten. --Palauenc05 (talk) 18:22, 17 March 2024 (UTC)
- @Palauenc05: Vielleicht möchtest Du bei Gelegenheit nochmal genauer auf die Frage(n) antworten :-) --P170 (talk) 18:18, 17 March 2024 (UTC)
Quality Image Promotion
[edit] |
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Trier Ehrang Pfeiffersbrücke.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
 |
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Trier Ehrang Petrus 2022.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
--QICbot (talk) 05:28, 19 March 2024 (UTC)
Valued Image Promoted
[edit]Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
50 Pfennig Notgeld banknote (1921) of Treuenbrietzen by Heinz Schiestl, reverse: Prince-elector Ludwig I..
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Fischers Maathes reclining on his sofa..
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.
.svg/15px-Pictogram_voting_comment_(orange).svg.png){kind=small}
--VICBot2 (talk) 00:20, 20 March 2024 (UTC)
Valued Image Promoted
[edit]Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
.jpg){kind=link}
Blankenheimer Kreuz in Trier-Ehrang, Germany (after restoration)..
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Statue of Saint Peter in Trier-Ehrang, Germany..
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Former stairway to "Pfeiffersbrücke" in Trier-Ehrang, Germany..
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.
--VICBot2 (talk) 00:20, 22 March 2024 (UTC)
Quality Image Promotion
[edit] |
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Trier-Ruwer Wegekreuz 1632.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
--QICbot (talk) 05:26, 24 March 2024 (UTC)
Quality Image Promotion
[edit].jpg) |
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Manternach Wegekreuz Syrdallstrooss (3).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
 |
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Manternach Wegekreuz Syrdallstrooss.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
--QICbot (talk) 05:23, 25 March 2024 (UTC)
Quality Image Promotion
[edit].jpg) |
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Mertert wayside shrine (1882).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
--QICbot (talk) 05:22, 26 March 2024 (UTC)
Valued Image Promoted
[edit]Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Wayside cross (1632) in Trier-Ruwer, Germany..
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.
--VICBot2 (talk) 00:19, 27 March 2024 (UTC)
Quality Image Promotion
[edit] |
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Mertert-Manternach Brücke über die Syr.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
--QICbot (talk) 05:37, 27 March 2024 (UTC)
Valued Image Promoted
[edit]Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Wayside cross in Manternach, Syrdallstrooss 29, Luxembourg..
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
River Syre between Mertert and Manternach, Luxembourg..
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.
--VICBot2 (talk) 00:21, 29 March 2024 (UTC)
Valued Image Promoted
[edit]Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
River Syre between Mertert and Manternach, Luxembourg..
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Wayside cross in Manternach, Syrdallstrooss 29, Luxembourg..
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.
--VICBot2 (talk) 00:26, 29 March 2024 (UTC)
Quality Image Promotion
[edit] |
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Zadar Votive column bell tower of Saint Elijah.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
--QICbot (talk) 05:30, 29 March 2024 (UTC)
Valued Image Promoted
[edit]Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Wayside cross in Manternach, Syrdallstrooss 29, Luxembourg..
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Electoral building (1730) in Freudenburg, Germany..
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
River Syre between Mertert and Manternach, Luxembourg..
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.
--VICBot2 (talk) 00:23, 30 March 2024 (UTC)
Valued Image Promoted
[edit]Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Wayside cross in Manternach, Syrdallstrooss 29, Luxembourg..
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
River Syre between Mertert and Manternach, Luxembourg..
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Electoral building (1730) in Freudenburg, Germany..
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.
--VICBot2 (talk) 00:29, 30 March 2024 (UTC)
Quality Image Promotion
[edit].jpg) |
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Heuschreckbrunnen (Koorscht o Kneisjen).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
.jpg) |
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Heuschreckbrunnen (Wichshänsjen).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
.jpg) |
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Heuschreckbrunnen3 (Krons Ton).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
--QICbot (talk) 05:33, 30 March 2024 (UTC)
Valued Image Promoted
[edit]Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
.jpg){kind=link}
"Koorscht o Kneisjen" on Heuschreckbrunnen in Trier, Germany..
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
.jpg){kind=link}
"Wichshänsjen" on Heuschreckbrunnen in Trier, Germany..
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.
--VICBot2 (talk) 00:20, 6 April 2024 (UTC)
FP Promotion
[edit] |
★ This image has been promoted to Featured picture! ★
The image File:Bielefeld 1 Mark 1921.jpg, that you nominated on Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Bielefeld 1 Mark 1921.jpg has been promoted. Thank you for your contribution. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so. |
|
/FPCBot (talk) 21:01, 8 April 2024 (UTC)
Quality Image Promotion
[edit] |
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Trier Mahnmal für Sinti und Roma.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
--QICbot (talk) 05:30, 9 April 2024 (UTC)
Valued Image Promoted
[edit]Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
.jpg){kind=link}
"Krons Ton" on Heuschreckbrunnen in Trier, Germany..
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.
--VICBot2 (talk) 00:20, 11 April 2024 (UTC)
FP Promotion
[edit] |
★ This image has been promoted to Featured picture! ★
The image File:Trier Mahnmal für Sinti und Roma.jpg, that you nominated on Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Trier Mahnmal für Sinti und Roma.jpg has been promoted. Thank you for your contribution. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so. |
|
/FPCBot (talk) 21:01, 15 April 2024 (UTC)
FP Promotion
[edit].jpg) |
★ This image has been promoted to Featured picture! ★
The image File:Trier alte Wache Cläre Prem (2).jpg, that you nominated on Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Trier alte Wache Cläre Prem (2).jpg has been promoted. Thank you for your contribution. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so. |
|
.jpg){kind=link}
/FPCBot (talk) 05:01, 3 May 2024 (UTC)
Notification about possible deletion
[edit]
|
Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry.
If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. |
Affected:
And also:
Yours sincerely, Rosenzweig τ 16:13, 19 May 2024 (UTC)
Notification about possible deletion
[edit]|
|
Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry.
If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. |
Affected:
And also:
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
Yours sincerely, Rosenzweig τ 18:54, 19 May 2024 (UTC)
Notification about possible deletion
[edit]|
|
Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry.
If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. |
Affected:
And also:
- File:Preetz 50 Pfg 1921 E1.jpg
- File:Preetz 50 Pfg 1921 P VS.jpg
- File:Preetz 50 Pfg 1921 P.jpg
- File:Preetz 50 Pfg 1921 T VS.jpg
- File:Preetz 50 Pfg 1921 T.jpg
- File:Preez 25 Pfg 1921.jpg
Yours sincerely, Rosenzweig τ 19:51, 19 May 2024 (UTC)
Notification about possible deletion
[edit]|
|
Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry.
If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. |
Affected:
And also:
Yours sincerely, Rosenzweig τ 09:59, 20 May 2024 (UTC)
Notification about possible deletion
[edit]|
|
Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry.
If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. |
Affected:
And also:
Yours sincerely, Rosenzweig τ 13:01, 20 May 2024 (UTC)
Notification about possible deletion
[edit]|
|
Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry.
If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. |
Affected:
Yours sincerely, Rosenzweig τ 20:16, 21 May 2024 (UTC)
Notification about possible deletion
[edit]|
|
Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry.
If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. |
Affected:
And also:
Yours sincerely, Rosenzweig τ 20:29, 21 May 2024 (UTC)
Notification about possible deletion
[edit]|
|
Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry.
If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. |
Affected:
And also:
- File:Potsdam 50 Pfennig 1921 Heufresser.jpg
- File:Potsdam 50 Pfennig 1921 Laubfrösche.jpg
- File:Potsdam 50 Pfennig 1921 Mehlsäcke.jpg
- File:Potsdam 50 Pfennig 1921 Paddenstecher.jpg
- File:Potsdam 50 Pfennig 1921 Strippenjungs.jpg
Yours sincerely, Rosenzweig τ 20:37, 21 May 2024 (UTC)
Notification about possible deletion
[edit]|
|
Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry.
If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. |
Affected:
And also:
- File:Lübeck 50 Pfg Heiligen-Geist-Hospital.jpg
- File:Lübeck 50 Pfg Holstentor.jpg
- File:Lübeck 50 Pfg Rathaus.jpg
- File:Lübeck 50 Pfg view of the old town.jpg
Yours sincerely, Rosenzweig τ 20:46, 21 May 2024 (UTC)
Notification about possible deletion
[edit]|
|
Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry.
If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. |
Affected:
Yours sincerely, Rosenzweig τ 18:52, 22 May 2024 (UTC)
Notification about possible deletion
[edit]|
|
Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry.
If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. |
Affected:
Yours sincerely, Rosenzweig τ 18:55, 22 May 2024 (UTC)
Notification about possible deletion
[edit]|
|
Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry.
If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. |
Affected:
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
And also:
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
Yours sincerely, Rosenzweig τ 23:19, 23 May 2024 (UTC)
Notification about possible deletion
[edit]|
|
Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry.
If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. |
Affected:
And also:
- File:Aken 50 Pfennig 1921 2 Tore.jpg
- File:Aken 50 Pfennig 1921 Elbe.jpg
- File:Aken 75 Pfennig 1921 Rathaus.jpg
Yours sincerely, Rosenzweig τ 18:38, 24 May 2024 (UTC)
|
|
File:Weimar 50 Pfennig 1921.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.
If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. |
Rosenzweig τ 12:11, 25 May 2024 (UTC)
Notification about possible deletion
[edit]|
|
Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry.
If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. |
Affected:
And also:
Yours sincerely, Rosenzweig τ 20:30, 26 May 2024 (UTC)
Notification about possible deletion
[edit]|
|
Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry.
If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. |
Affected:
.jpg){kind=link}
And also:
.jpg){kind=link}
Yours sincerely, Rosenzweig τ 07:33, 16 July 2024 (UTC)